Mississippi Clears Officer in Toddler’s Fatal Shooting

Office of the Attorney General building sign on stone wall
Photo: Heidi Besen / Shutterstock

Mississippi’s attorney general ruled a police shooting that killed 1-year-old Kohen Wiley justified, but released almost no evidence to show why.

Story Snapshot

  • The attorney general said the officer’s force was justified after a state investigation.
  • Investigators said the driver moved toward officers, nearly hitting one.
  • The public has not seen the full videos or the investigative file.
  • The family’s independent autopsy says the shot came from the side, not the front.

What Officials Decided And Why It Matters

Mississippi’s Attorney General’s Office said the officer who fired outside a Senatobia Walmart used justified force. The office said it reviewed a Mississippi Bureau of Investigation case file under the state’s officer-involved shooting process, then declined charges. Officials cited the claim that the vehicle moved toward officers and nearly struck one as the key danger that triggered the shot. The public statement did not share the legal memo or detailed evidence behind the decision, only the conclusion.

The Mississippi Bureau of Investigation had led the probe and then gave its findings to the attorney general for review, as the state process lays out. Reports said agents gathered statements and reviewed body camera, dash camera, and Walmart surveillance video during the months-long inquiry. That workflow tracks how most states handle such cases. But the gap between what officials say they saw and what the public can see fuels doubt across the political spectrum.

The Evidence The Public Still Cannot See

Officials have not released the body camera video, dash camera video, or the Walmart footage that they said they reviewed. The attorney general’s summary did not share the officer’s name, the number of shots, the firing angle, or how close officers were to the car. Without those facts, people cannot judge the risk officers faced or the tactics used with a child in the vehicle. That secrecy invites anger and claims of a system that protects itself first.

One report said five state agents interviewed witnesses and reviewed several types of video from the scene. But the public cannot assess where officers stood, how the car moved, or how the shot lined up with the driver’s path. A short bystander clip that surfaced did not show the car driving toward officers or the shots, according to reporting, which leaves the core question unresolved for many viewers. The result is a call for full footage and a clear, time-stamped reconstruction.

The Family’s Autopsy And The Core Dispute

The family’s attorney, Ben Crump, shared a preliminary independent autopsy that found the fatal round entered Kohen Wiley’s right chest and exited the left. He said the path was consistent with a shot through the passenger-side window, not the windshield, and argued that it undercuts the claim that the car was moving straight at an officer. The attorney general’s public statement did not address that trajectory, which keeps the debate alive and sharp.

Medical findings about wound paths can raise good questions, but they do not, by themselves, settle how a vehicle moved at a given second. A full answer needs synced videos, a map of officer and vehicle positions, and a shot-by-shot timeline. The state says it saw enough to clear the officer. The family and many citizens say, show your work. That divide is exactly where trust in public institutions rises or falls in cases like this.

Why This Case Hits A National Nerve

Americans on the right and left see a pattern. Police shootings are often reviewed by agencies that work alongside police, and charges are rare nationwide. Research from major universities has warned for years that even the appearance of close ties can erode trust in the outcome. People want a process that is transparent, independent, and fast, especially when a child is killed. When leaders release only a brief conclusion, they almost guarantee public backlash.

What Would Build Trust Now

Officials could release all nonexempt parts of the Mississippi Bureau of Investigation file, including the report, interview summaries, and a redacted evidence index. They could publish every body camera, dash camera, and Walmart video with synced timestamps. They could provide a clear legal memo that explains the standard used and how the facts met it. Those steps would not please everyone. But they would treat the public like adults and help people judge the decision on facts, not rumors.

Sources:

washingtontimes.com, actionnews5.com, atlantablackstar.com, desotocountynews.com, wreg.com, bostonherald.com, mississippitoday.org, wbay.com