Tom Homan Demands DOJ Review AOC’s Webinar Teaching Illegal Immigrants To Avoid ICE

Border Czar Tom Homan has reached out to the Department of Justice to determine whether Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) violated federal law by advising illegal immigrants on how to handle encounters with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Homan questioned whether her actions could be considered obstruction of law enforcement and requested clarification from the Deputy U.S. Attorney General.

Ocasio-Cortez hosted a virtual event titled “Know Your Rights With ICE,” which was streamed live on social media. The webinar instructed illegal immigrants on how to refuse consent for searches, avoid answering questions from ICE agents, and seek legal representation if detained. The event specifically targeted residents in her congressional district, which includes parts of Queens and the Bronx.

Homan, a former acting director of ICE, stated that interfering with immigration enforcement is a serious matter and suggested that Ocasio-Cortez’s involvement in guiding illegal immigrants could cross legal boundaries. He emphasized that he is awaiting the DOJ’s opinion on whether her actions meet the threshold for impeding law enforcement efforts.

Ocasio-Cortez fired back, accusing ICE agents of breaking the law by entering homes without warrants. She claimed that her event was intended to educate her constituents on their rights and ensure ICE officers follow legal procedures. She also reiterated that immigration violations are a civil matter, not a criminal offense.

While legal analysts acknowledge that Know Your Rights seminars have been held by activists and attorneys for years, they note that actively encouraging individuals to evade law enforcement could lead to legal scrutiny. The DOJ has yet to confirm whether it will investigate Ocasio-Cortez’s involvement.

The Trump administration has been clear in its stance that obstructing federal immigration enforcement will not be tolerated. Whether Ocasio-Cortez’s webinar is determined to have violated the law remains a decision for the DOJ.