FBI Employee Under Fire For Disparaging Remarks After Trump Assassination Attempt

An individual claiming to be an FBI employee has stirred controversy by expressing disappointment on social media that the assassination attempt against President Donald Trump at a Pennsylvania rally was unsuccessful. Following the attack, posts emerged with comments like “don’t miss next time” and “so close,” showcasing disturbing reactions to the incident.

The staffer, identified as Jenna Howell, also criticized those mourning the violence, posting, “Y’all gun-toting, 2nd Amendment-loving hillbillies better just sit down and stay quiet unless you’re gonna change your mind on gun control.” Details about how the gunman acquired the firearm have not been disclosed by authorities.

Former FBI analyst Chris Toompas, who claims to have worked with Howell in the NICS Firearms Background Check Unit, condemned her actions. Howell is currently reported to be with the FBI’s Identity Research Department.

“The only thing leftists love to do is hate those who disagree with them, and in this instance, wish for their death,” Toompas remarked, highlighting a contentious environment within the FBI.

Toompas also shared his own experience, stating, “I went to Facebook during my suspension to voice my disdain for the mandate and share my suspension story. When I did so, [Howell] threatened to report me to the FBI for violating the FBI’s Facebook policy. The irony.”

Reports of anti-Trump sentiments within the FBI are not new. At least one whistleblower has claimed that the Bureau has forced out employees who openly support Trump.

The FBI has not yet commented on Howell’s alleged remarks or whether any disciplinary actions will be taken. This incident raises concerns about the political neutrality of the FBI, especially in the wake of such a serious event.

As investigations continue, the FBI’s handling of internal dissent and political bias will likely come under increased scrutiny. This controversy underscores the importance of impartiality within federal agencies and the impact of personal biases on public trust.